<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intel® Software Network Blogs &#187; Manageability</title>
	<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 04:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Intel MEBx and QWERTY Keyboard</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/16/intel-mebx-and-qwerty-keyboard/</link>
		<comments>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/16/intel-mebx-and-qwerty-keyboard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sreelekshmy Syamalakumari (Intel)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Manageability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/16/intel-mebx-and-qwerty-keyboard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently we came across an interesting question on the Manageability forum on password getting rejected while trying to connect to an AMT system using a web browser or Intel AMT DTK tools. We asked the customer to double check his password; confirm that his password follows the guidelines for AMT ME passwords, reset his CMOS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently we came across an interesting question on the Manageability forum on password getting rejected while trying to connect to an AMT system using a web browser or Intel AMT DTK tools. We asked the customer to double check his password; confirm that his password follows the guidelines for AMT ME passwords, reset his CMOS settings, etc etc… But the issue was still out there.</p>
<p>Finally we figured that the issue is with his keyboard mapping. MEBx thinks that your are typing on a QWERTY keyboard and if you are in an OS that has a different keyboard mapping, the password will not match. The customer was using a British English keyboard, the layout of which was different than a US keyboard. We asked him to go into MEBx and try to change the computer's network name and type in his password there and take a look at what shows up on the screen – it was not what he thought he was typing.</p>
<p>So here is what you should do if you are using a non-US keyboard – type a password in MEBx as if you have a US keyboard. If you are not sure, go in to MEBx hostname and type a password and look at the results on the screen. Typing a password using only keys that are the same on US keyboards also works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/16/intel-mebx-and-qwerty-keyboard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take Five Video Series - are you watching?</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/16/take-five-video-series-are-you-watching/</link>
		<comments>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/16/take-five-video-series-are-you-watching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amelia Barton (Intel)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intel® Software Network 2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Manageability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobility]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Multicore]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[skulltrail]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/16/take-five-video-series-are-you-watching/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, Friday, my favorite day for watching a few videos at work.
I've been monitoring how many developers are watching all of the segments of the video series we've posted on the Take Five site.   It is natural that not everyone will make it to the end, but I'm wondering if there is anything we could do better.
First, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Friday, my favorite day for watching a few videos at work.</p>
<p>I've been monitoring how many developers are watching all of the segments of the video series we've posted on the <a href="http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/videos">Take Five</a> site.   It is natural that not everyone will make it to the end, but I'm wondering if there is anything we could do better.</p>
<p>First, I'd like to know if any of these are the causes:<br />
  A) Didn't know series were there<br />
  B) Watched the video from a different page w/out the series navigation<br />
  C) Didn't have time to watch them all<br />
  D) The video, well, just wasn't that interesting<br />
  E) My boss walked by, and I had to quickly switch screens from videos<br />
  F)  Other:  ______________ </p>
<p>Take a look at two of the series we've posted from the Game Developers Conference:  <a href="http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/videos/home.aspx?fn=1485">Optimizing DirectX for Mulicore</a>, or the <a href="http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/videos/home.aspx?fn=1398">SkullTrail series</a> with <a href="http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/videos/home.aspx?fn=1396">GRIN Software*</a> and <a href="http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/videos/home.aspx?fn=1397">UbiSoft*</a>.  Or the very long <a href="http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/videos/home.aspx?fn=1448">Confronting ManyCore</a> series.   Once a video is playing in the player at the top of the site, there is a link that says "see Next in series" and/or "see Previous in series" to easily (at least I thought) move from one to the next. </p>
<p>While you in the player, you can rate the videos, get the embed code and direct links, leave comments, and/or link back to the blogs.</p>
<p>To see more series, they are in "series boxes" on the tabs below the <a href="http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/videos">Take Five player</a>.  If you mouse over the numer, you will get a video description. Be sure to click on the blue arrow to see the Virtualization and Community, and coming soon, Open Source tabs. </p>
<p>I'd love to hear your comments, and answers to the mulitple choice above.  I'm hoping I don't get too many D's.</p>
<p>Happy Friday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/16/take-five-video-series-are-you-watching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel® AMT and Remote Desktop</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/16/intel-amt-and-remote-desktop/</link>
		<comments>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/16/intel-amt-and-remote-desktop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sreelekshmy Syamalakumari (Intel)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Manageability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/16/intel-amt-and-remote-desktop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Intel AMT block remote desktop traffic? Not a chance. Then “why am I not able to remote desktop to and from my Dell Optiplex 755 system after installing all the drivers? I was able to remote desktop to and from this system to any other system on the network before installing the drivers”. We [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Intel AMT block remote desktop traffic? Not a chance. Then “why am I not able to remote desktop to and from my Dell Optiplex 755 system after installing all the drivers? I was able to remote desktop to and from this system to any other system on the network before installing the drivers”. We received this question on the Manageability forum a couple of weeks back.</p>
<p>Well, the issue here is that you have installed the wrong video driver on the system, which is not caught as an issue in the Device Manager. But if you look at the Event Viewer, you could see that the dll associated with your video driver has been failed to load properly. If you see this error, download and install the correct video driver either from the CD shipped along with your system or Dell support site or from the video card download site.</p>
<p>There is a forum post on Dell site regarding this at <a href="http://www.dellcommunity.com/supportforums/board/message?board.id=Desktops_Workstation_Optiplex&amp;message.id=3098&amp;query.id=146206#M3098">http://www.dellcommunity.com/supportforums/board/message?board.id=Desktops_Workstation_Optiplex&amp;message.id=3098&amp;query.id=146206#M3098</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/16/intel-amt-and-remote-desktop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel AMT Reflector and local manageability</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/14/intel-amt-reflector-and-local-manageability/</link>
		<comments>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/14/intel-amt-reflector-and-local-manageability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ylian Saint-hilaire (Intel)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Manageability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intel AMT DTK Ylian Reflector Local Remote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/14/intel-amt-reflector-and-local-manageability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many of you may know, there are two ways of contacting Intel AMT: The remote network interface and the local LMS/HECI interface. These interfaces are very different; the remote interface that is available thru the wired and sometimes wireless Ethernet and is rich with features while the local Intel AMT interface is very limited. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many of you may know, there are two ways of contacting Intel AMT: The remote network interface and the local LMS/HECI interface. These interfaces are very different; the remote interface that is available thru the wired and sometimes wireless Ethernet and is rich with features while the local Intel AMT interface is very limited. Intel AMT was designed this way from the start for security. Intel AMT acting as an IT agent on desktops and laptops could not be allowed to be meddled with by the local user or local applications that could try to use or deactivate Intel AMT. That at least was the original design intent.</p>
<p>Times have changed it seems and many users of Intel AMT don’t see local users and applications as being always hostile. There are many reasons why it would be very interesting to access all of the features of Intel AMT locally. For example</p>
<ul>
<li><!--[if !supportLists]--><!--[endif]-->If the user changes the name of the computer is the OS, it would be nice to have a local agent sync up the Intel AMT network with the OS name automatically. This way, when the computer goes to sleep next, Intel AMT will report the correct new name.</li>
<li><!--[if !supportLists]-->Circuit breaker policies could be used as a local firewall implemented in hardware. Set it once and the gigabit network chip does all the filtering and counters at gigabit speeds.</li>
<li><!--[if !supportLists]--><!--[endif]-->On a mobile platform, wireless profiles could also be synched up automatically. The user adds a new wireless profile with a WPA key and this profile is automatically added to Intel AMT.</li>
<li>Enterprise provisioning of Intel AMT could be done entirely locally using local software removing the need for complicated centralized servers.</li>
</ul>
<p>Instead of seeing the local user as hostile, the local application now cooperate to setup Intel AMT so that if something goes wrong, it’s ready to be used to recover the computer. All this and more would be possible if Intel AMT allows the local applications full access to all the remote interface features.</p>
<p>A local application can’t simply connect to TCP port 16992 or 16993 and access all of the Intel AMT features since the traffic has to flow thru the gigabit network interface. Connecting to 127.0.0.1 will not work, that will access the more limited local interface.</p>
<p>The solution is to use a reflection application like Intel AMT Reflector found in the <a href="http://www.intel.com/software/amt-dtk">Intel AMT DTK</a>. This tool runs on a central always on server and simply reflects back all TCP connections back to the source on ports 16992 to 16995. Using this tool an Intel AMT console or even a web browser can connect to “http://reflector:16992” and log into its own Intel AMT remote services. However, there are issues with this solution: You need this reflector tool running and know where on the network it is running. Also, a rogue application could log into the remote interface and put an annoying circuit breaker policy to drop all packets, etc.</p>
<p>In the future, Intel AMT itself could be modified to allow all services on the local interface removing the need for the reflector. There are security considerations of course, but feedback from users of Intel AMT on this idea would be appreciated.</p>
<p>Ylian</p>
<p><img src="http://softwareblogs.intel.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/reflector.jpg" alt="Intel AMT Reflector" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/14/intel-amt-reflector-and-local-manageability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep It Simple!</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/11/keep-it-simple/</link>
		<comments>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/11/keep-it-simple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 03:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Valdovinos (Intel)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intel SW Partner Program]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Manageability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobility]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Multicore]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/11/keep-it-simple/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These were more or less the words of wisdom that a well respected blog-vet offered as I was contemplating my initial post. Who am I? I started with Intel in 1984 as a software engineer and have since held a variety of technical, marketing, and program management roles. In my current role, I get to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Times New Roman">These were more or less the words of wisdom that a well respected blog-vet offered as I was contemplating my initial post. Who am I? I started with Intel in 1984 as a software engineer and have since held a variety of technical, marketing, and program management roles. In my current role, I get to manage programs within the <a href="http://www.intel.com/partner" title="Intel Software Partner Program">Intel Software Partner Program </a>(ISPP) that help ISVs enable their SW for the latest Intel technologies such as client management (vpro), virtualization, mobility, and graphics – and also, amplify their sales with unique program marketing &amp; sales benefits.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">I cannot envision a more exciting time to be working in the technology industry, and especially, at Intel. Tick-tock, multi-core, low power, atom, larrabee, wimax, mids, 45nm are just a few of the potentially game changing strategies and technologies that Intel is driving today. However, none of these breakthroughs will make a big difference in the marketplace unless ISVs can effectively incorporate them into products that deliver real value and excitement to customers. This is the ‘simple’ premise behind ISPP: Make it easy for ISVs to align their products with the Intel roadmap and enjoy increased business success as a result.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">In my past life as an engineer, I got a real kick in the pants from creating new SW and hearing feedback from customers about how cool our app was…or sometimes, wasn't! These days my ‘kick’ comes from driving our talented engineering, ISN developer community, and marketing teams to deliver enabling programs that help you and your company to capitalize on Intel's technology leadership. I’m looking forward to sharing my thoughts and ideas about SW enabling in future posts, but am even more eager to hear your feedback about how we can make ISPP work better. Simple enough?</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/11/keep-it-simple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My trip to see the Intel AMT development team</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/06/my-trip-to-see-the-intel-amt-development-team/</link>
		<comments>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/06/my-trip-to-see-the-intel-amt-development-team/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ylian Saint-hilaire (Intel)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Manageability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intel AMT DTK Ylian Israel Jordan Petra Dead Sea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/06/my-trip-to-see-the-intel-amt-development-team/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week Intel sent me to Israel for an Intel only gathering of engineers, architects and specialists that work on Intel AMT. I was honored to attend and also to be a speaker taking about the progress made with the DTK. First of all, I want to thank all of the people in Intel Israel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week Intel sent me to Israel for an Intel only gathering of engineers, architects and specialists that work on Intel AMT. I was honored to attend and also to be a speaker taking about the progress made with the DTK. First of all, I want to thank all of the people in Intel Israel for making this trip a great success. I also got to hear about many DTK success stories and it all of the hard work worth it. I was especially surprised with the DTK’s success in Asia, but also all over the world. I am still not sure if it’s the tutorial videos, the translations or what.</p>
<p>In addition to the meetings, we had a great time visiting the old city of Jerusalem, the Dead Sea and later on my own the city of Elat and Petra in Jordan. I got some of the most wonderful pictures and uploaded some on Google servers here:</p>
<p><a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/ysainthilaire/Israel200802">http://picasaweb.google.com/ysainthilaire/Israel200802</a></p>
<p>These pictures cover the 10 days of my trip, starting with the old city then me playing in the mud and floating in the Dead Sea and finishing with my visit to Jordan. Jordan was probably this highlight of this trip, there is something just odd about traveling in this vast desert and realizing that I was in the country that had a common border with Iraq. For most of us in the US, it seems so distant. The city of Petra in Jordon has unique sand stone carvings in the walls. Some people will also notice that the Indiana Jones movie was filmed at this location. Petra was named one of the new <a href="http://www.new7wonders.com/classic/en/n7w/results/">7 wonders of the world</a> and as a result got a surge in tourism. It’s a wonderful place, hot and laid back.</p>
<p>Most people travel by air from Jerusalem to Elat and Jordan, but I opted to take the bus. It’s a 4 and a half hour trip thru amazing scenery. It’s also inexpensive, about 12 to 15$ and much more convenient than by airplane. I will say that except for the bus, everything was very expensive in US dollars. It’s a shame the dollar is so weak, I don’t except to make many of these trips.</p>
<p>Last week was the holocaust memorial day in Israel and I happened to visit the Wailing Wall with some of my Intel co-workers just as 1000’s of people where attending a ceremony that was being broadcast live on TV. One of my pictures shows all the people at the wall.</p>
<p>The Dead Sea was really amazing, it’s so saturated with salt that you simply float. This sea is the lowest point on Earth I am told, it’s 1,378 feet below sea level. Your ears pop on the way there as the air pressure increases. As pressure increases so does the temperature which will often be 10 degrees hotter than Jerusalem. The Dead Sea is well known for the Dead Sea salts used as skin treatment. It also gave me a great excuse to play in the mud! You let it dry and wash it off to wonderful skin… but it’s also just loads of fun.</p>
<p>To sum it up, this 10 day trip was simply amazing. In addition to meeting many people who use the DTK, I also got to see and experience some unique places I will never forget.</p>
<p>Ylian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/06/my-trip-to-see-the-intel-amt-development-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Port Radio - Blog Talk Radio Show</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/06/open-port-radio-blog-talk-radio-show/</link>
		<comments>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/06/open-port-radio-blog-talk-radio-show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ajay Mungara (Intel)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Manageability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/06/open-port-radio-blog-talk-radio-show/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Yesterday, I was invited as a guest speaker to the Open Port Radio- Blog Talk radio show to chat about Manageability Developer Community. I really enjoyed the interaction with the hosts Josh Hilliker, Russ Pam and Jeff Torello from the the Intel vPro Expert Center. Intel vPro Expert Center is a community focused on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Yesterday, I was invited as a guest speaker to the Open Port Radio- Blog Talk radio show to chat about <a href="http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/communities/manageability">Manageability Developer Community</a>. I really enjoyed the interaction with the hosts Josh Hilliker, Russ Pam and Jeff Torello from the the <a href="http://communities.intel.com/community/vproexpert">Intel vPro Expert Center</a>. Intel vPro Expert Center is a community focused on Integration, Activation and Deployment of Intel Active Management Technology (Intel AMT). I strongly encourage the ISVs with ready-to-market manageability applications to participate in the vPro Expert Center for integration &amp; deployment related discussions. In the radio show, I responded to questions such as, a) target audience for the developer community b) similarities, differences and collaboration opportunities between the vPro Expert Center and the developer community c) ISVs currently using the developer community, etc.</p>
<p>You can listen to the archived radio show either on the <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/openport/2008/05/05/Intel-vPro-Expert-Center-Manageability-Developer-Community">blog talk radio website</a> or <a href="http://softwareblogs.intel.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/show_188265.mp3">download &amp; listen</a> to the mp3 file. I was also told that <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/openport">Open Port Radio </a>is inviting some really cool guest speakers to their future shows, so do look for shows that may interest you.</p>
<p><a href="http://softwareblogs.intel.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/show_188265.mp3" title="Blog Talk Radio Show"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/06/open-port-radio-blog-talk-radio-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://softwareblogs.intel.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/show_188265.mp3" length="6885169" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What programming language do you use in developing for Intel AMT?</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/05/what-programming-language-do-you-use-in-developing-for-intel-amt/</link>
		<comments>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/05/what-programming-language-do-you-use-in-developing-for-intel-amt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 20:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ajay Mungara (Intel)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Manageability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/05/what-programming-language-do-you-use-in-developing-for-intel-amt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be real honest, I actually don't like when somebody asks questions like this "what programming languages do you use?" or worst "What programming language is right for me?". What annoys me the most is when this question does not come with any background information. It is like asking someone what is your preferred mode [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be real honest, I actually don't like when somebody asks questions like this "what programming languages do you use?" or worst "What programming language is right for me?". What annoys me the most is when this question does not come with any background information. It is like asking someone what is your preferred mode of transportation. The answer is "it depends" - do I enjoy driving my car? Sure, I do. But, do I prefer to drive my car from New York to LA? Not really. Lot of factors can influence your decision on the mode of transportation, like the cost, time, and distance, among other things. I am sure that your decision to use a particular programming language for Intel AMT development has been influenced by a multitude of factors and I am not about to judge your programming language choices.</p>
<p>I am only interested to understand the programming language you are using in order to influence our engineers to provide sample code in the programming language you prefer. You might have also noticed that the "<a href="http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/articles/eng/1183.htm">RDK - Reference Design Kit</a>" - a Java sample application and source code - has not been updated recently and I am about to <strong>*yank* </strong> this tool from the community. The reason is simple, it is hard to justify the continued development and support of this tool when some of the engineers are convinced that a C++ and/or C# sample is all we need to cover the majority of the Intel AMT developers. And, I can only push for Java samples to be developed with your help. Please do respond to this blog post or take a minute to respond to the *poll* we have created on the manageability developer community home page.<br />
<strong>Question:</strong> What programming language do you use with Intel AMT?<br />
<strong>Poll Options:</strong></p>
<ol type="a">
<li>C/C++</li>
<li>C#</li>
<li>Java</li>
<li>Scripting Language</li>
<li>Other</li>
</ol>
<p>Also, please do let me know if you particularly think a "Java" based sample application similar to "<a href="http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/articles/eng/1034.htm">DTK - Developer Tool Kit</a>" can really help with your Intel AMT development efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/05/05/what-programming-language-do-you-use-in-developing-for-intel-amt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel® SCS 3.2.2 is now available for download</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/04/22/intel-scs-322-is-now-available-for-download/</link>
		<comments>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/04/22/intel-scs-322-is-now-available-for-download/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gael Holmes (Intel)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Manageability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AMT]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SCS 3.2.2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Strong Password]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/04/22/intel-scs-322-is-now-available-for-download/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SCS 3.2.2 includes the following new feature:

The user can now type-in the SQL server username and password, to address their own Data Base strong password requirements.
Note that this change is NOT included in the 3.3 Version of the SCS
Use SCS 3.2.2 only if you have a Strong Password requirement for the SQL data base user and cannot use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SCS 3.2.2 includes the following new feature:</p>
<ul>
<li>The user can now type-in the SQL server username and password, to address their own Data Base strong password requirements.</li>
<li>Note that this change is NOT included in the 3.3 Version of the SCS</li>
<li>Use SCS 3.2.2 <strong>only </strong>if you have a Strong Password requirement for the SQL data base user and cannot use SCS 3.3 because of this.</li>
</ul>
<p>You can download this version <a href="http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/articles/eng/1182.htm">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/04/22/intel-scs-322-is-now-available-for-download/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My home computer continued...</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/04/22/my-home-computer-continued/</link>
		<comments>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/04/22/my-home-computer-continued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ylian Saint-hilaire (Intel)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Manageability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intel AMT DTK home computer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/04/22/my-home-computer-continued/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so I worked a lot to get my dream entertainment computer up and running. I am not a gamer, but I also don't like to watch live television and need a home server for backups, keepings my files and doing a bunch of other things. Now that I built it, I going to brag [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so I worked a lot to get my dream entertainment computer up and running. I am not a gamer, but I also don't like to watch live television and need a home server for backups, keepings my files and doing a bunch of other things. Now that I built it, I going to brag about it a little on my blog. Of course, I can do so because not only does it use some of Intel best technologies, it also includes Intel AMT 3.0.</p>
<p>I started out with an Intel DQ35JO motherboard, a Intel Core 2 QUAD processor, 4 hard disks, 3 gigs of RAM, 2 DVD recorders, an NVidia 6600 fan less video card, Hauppauge dual NTSC tuner and an <a href="http://www.silicondust.com/">HDHomerun</a> dual ATSC tuner. All together, it's a great machine.</p>
<p>Probably the two biggest performance highlights of the system is the processor and the 4 hard disks in RAID5 configuration. I never had a RAID before and I am quite impressed. RAID comes built into the motherboard, just plug the hard disks and about 5 minutes of setup will get you going. Microsoft Vista RC1 includes the Intel RAID drivers in the setup disk so, starting with RC1 it's really easy.</p>
<p>One of the problems I ran into was the computer going into S3 state and hanging on a black screen when waking up. Many people face the same problem all over the Internet, in my case, the very latest Intel BIOS update did the trick. I will have to thank the guys releasing the Intel BIOS next time I see them, some of them at here in Oregon.</p>
<p>The weakest part of my computer is certainly the video card. I get top scores in Microsoft Vista's scoring for everything except the video card. Also, getting an HDCP compliant video card and BlueRay would also be cool at some point.</p>
<p>What makes this computer special for me of course is AMT 3.0... actually AMT 3.2 to be precise. This new update to Intel AMT offers improved WSMAN support but I have not tested it yet with the <a href="http://www.intel.com/software/amt-dtk">DTK</a> and so, expect to start working on it now.</p>
<p>Of course, you can see me talk about my computer on this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCcG4nMA888">YouTube video</a>.</p>
<p>Ylian</p>
<p><img src="http://softwareblogs.intel.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/img_0152s.jpg" alt="Ylian" /></p>
<p><img src="http://softwareblogs.intel.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/img_0153s.jpg" alt="Ylian" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/04/22/my-home-computer-continued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
