<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Behold the power of the Atom!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clay Breshears (Intel)</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10838</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Breshears (Intel)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 06:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10838</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of superhero names for all future products.  We already have "flash" memory.  The Punisher and Wolverine products should be popular.  I think Batman and Superman are a bit too iconic, but Raven and Nighthawk would be pretty cool names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of superhero names for all future products.  We already have "flash" memory.  The Punisher and Wolverine products should be popular.  I think Batman and Superman are a bit too iconic, but Raven and Nighthawk would be pretty cool names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Seigh</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10812</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Seigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10812</guid>
		<description>From what I've heard, it's a mostly in order processor so there might be some effects from this.  Though by the time most of us get access to one most of this will have been ameliorated by library implementations and compilers.

I'm interested in low  power, quiet, multi-core desktops.  Despite everyone talking about being green, you don't see too much in this area.  Nothing if you don't count being compromised in some way.  I'm predicting more of the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I've heard, it's a mostly in order processor so there might be some effects from this.  Though by the time most of us get access to one most of this will have been ameliorated by library implementations and compilers.</p>
<p>I'm interested in low  power, quiet, multi-core desktops.  Despite everyone talking about being green, you don't see too much in this area.  Nothing if you don't count being compromised in some way.  I'm predicting more of the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdwardOCallaghan</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10804</link>
		<dc:creator>EdwardOCallaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10804</guid>
		<description>I wonder if you could do the same with the SPARC ISA ?
However I do like the sounds of 2w but x86 == :p
Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if you could do the same with the SPARC ISA ?<br />
However I do like the sounds of 2w but x86 == :p<br />
Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giles Smith</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10800</link>
		<dc:creator>Giles Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10800</guid>
		<description>Ah, I was just happing a cheap dig, I switched to Intel a year ago and I have been happy so far!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I was just happing a cheap dig, I switched to Intel a year ago and I have been happy so far!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Moriarty (Intel)</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10793</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Moriarty (Intel)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10793</guid>
		<description>Giles, I hope ALL of our chips have some substance.  Fortunately we have a very vocal blogosphere that will let us know if they don't.

I haven't been a fan of several of our product names, but this one I rather like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giles, I hope ALL of our chips have some substance.  Fortunately we have a very vocal blogosphere that will let us know if they don't.</p>
<p>I haven't been a fan of several of our product names, but this one I rather like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giles SMith</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10791</link>
		<dc:creator>Giles SMith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10791</guid>
		<description>At first I thought the name Atom would be a good idea for Intel’s new chip range, but the more I think about it the more I hope that their chips won’t actually be anything like an atom and actually have some substance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I thought the name Atom would be a good idea for Intel’s new chip range, but the more I think about it the more I hope that their chips won’t actually be anything like an atom and actually have some substance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  Ray Zed Blog</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10818</link>
		<dc:creator> Ray Zed Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-10818</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Joshua Topolsky:   I am eternally in awe of Intel’s ability to get a news announcement to all corners of the known universe faster than the speed of light. I am officially the LAST blog post to talk about the renaming of Silverthorn to Atom.&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/feed/"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h11.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>Joshua Topolsky:   I am eternally in awe of Intel’s ability to get a news announcement to all corners of the known universe faster than the speed of light. I am officially the LAST blog post to talk about the renaming of Silverthorn to Atom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PodTech.net</title>
		<link>http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-11074</link>
		<dc:creator>PodTech.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/#comment-11074</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;s latest move to revolutionize mobility computing, from UMPCs to mobile Internet devices and even notebooks and desktops (er, “netbooks” and “net-tops”). While Atom (nee Silverthorne) received itsbrand-new brand namerecently, the family of tiny processors, which relies on 45nm technology just like the Penryn line of Core 2 Duo processors, will debut in devices on display at IDF in Shanghai in early April.  It’&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="technorati-balloon" href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url=http://softwareblogs.intel.com/2008/03/03/behold-the-power-of-the-atom/feed/"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h11.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>s latest move to revolutionize mobility computing, from UMPCs to mobile Internet devices and even notebooks and desktops (er, “netbooks” and “net-tops”). While Atom (nee Silverthorne) received itsbrand-new brand namerecently, the family of tiny processors, which relies on 45nm technology just like the Penryn line of Core 2 Duo processors, will debut in devices on display at IDF in Shanghai in early April.  It’</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
